7/20/2023 0 Comments Live speech to text software![]() Differences in the capacity of the working memory do not seem to affect text reduction as such. There is a large amount of evidence suggesting that respeakers prefer to omit certain comments rather than reducing them to a certain extent.It also appears that the decision to fully omit a comment seems not to be primarily based on the amount of input, while the decision to partially reduce is. delay, amount of source text and the proportion of ‘full’ reductions. In contrast, it is largely determined by a number of external factors, viz. In the qualitative analysis, we discussed the effects of commonly used reduction strategies.The results show that reduction is not a random process. In the quantitative analysis we opted for a multilevel analysis to take into account the hierarchical nature of the data. Both a quantitative and qualitative analysis were carried out. Various subtitle features, such as reduction percentages and delay, as well as measures of the respeakers’ working memory were collected. They were instructed to do this in three different reduction conditions. Three excerpts of an infotainment talk show were subtitled by twelve respeakers of the Flemish public television. Although live subtitles are nearly always a reduced form of the spoken comments, the exact causes of text reduction are still largely unidentified.This study aims at a better understanding of the causes and consequences of text reduction in a live subtitling context. Despite the considerable prior research into the quality of live subtitling using speech recognition, little research has focused on the quantitative aspects of subtitles. ![]() Speech technology has made it possible to use speech recognition for simultaneous subtitling of live television broadcasts via the technique of respeaking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |